Directive and Non-Directive Pedagogy: 3 differences

George Alvarez 17-10-2023
George Alvarez

The teacher is one of the central figures in the formation of the human being. directive pedagogy Furthermore, our goal is to trace three differences between educational practices and their consequences. Check it out!

A brief introduction to the concept of pedagogy

In order to start dealing with directive pedagogy, we will first define what pedagogy is. We want to remember that the concept of pedagogy here should be seen in a broader way, that is, to consider pedagogy not only as a course for training teachers of children.

Know that the idea of pedagogy involves the practices, techniques, and strategies of teaching and learning. Therefore, pedagogy is an element that is part of every teacher's job. Thus, it is present in all forms of teaching, regardless of the subject and age group of the students.

Ideally, all teachers should know about classroom practices It is not by chance that basic education institutions, from nursery school to high school, require teachers to have a proven education in pedagogy or a degree.

What is directive pedagogy?

Once the idea of pedagogy is clear, we can deal with what directive pedagogy is. Know that there are several educational practices, and all of them have teaching as their goal. However, there are methods that consciously or unconsciously bring about other effects.

See_also: To dream of dirty laundry: what does it mean?

Roughly speaking, we can consider that the directive pedagogy is a pedagogical approach in which the teacher speaks and the student reproduces. This means that the student must follow all the instructions that are given to him.

This is because in directive pedagogy, the teacher is the only one who has the knowledge, and is the central authority figure, who makes all the decisions during the teaching and learning process.

The problems of directive pedagogy

The use of directive pedagogy was very common, in fact, even today we can find some of its remnants. However, this practice carries with it some problems, as we will see below.

  • The student does not reflect on the content

Since the teacher is the one who passes on the content, the student becomes a mere repeater. In other words, the student does not reflect on what he is learning, training is more concerned with creating repeating students or to make it more clear, parrots.

  • Decorating instead of understanding

The directive pedagogy also makes the students memorize the contents. In this sense, the objective of the lesson is not important, but to fill the student with data. For example, many of us had to copy and memorize the various endings of the Portuguese verb tenses.

This is because most of the time the only reason to memorize is to do well in the exam. Even today, the same thing happens with the vestibulars.

  • Student's knowledge is put aside

Once only the teacher's knowledge is valid, the student's experiences and knowledge are put aside. The idea that the student is an empty book that needs to be filled is still held. And the school ends up mistakenly considering itself the only possible form of education.

See_also: Procrustus: the myth and his bed in Greek mythology

Because of this, many students have difficulties learning, since the teacher's content does not dialogue with your reality It is no wonder that many students question what they will do with such content.

What is non-directive pedagogy?

Faced with these and other problems, pedagogical practices have undergone changes in the last decades. For this reason, a non-directive pedagogy has been discussed and established. Understand that it works in a way contrary to the practices we have seen so far.

So here are the three main differences between directive and non-directive pedagogy.

  1. Teacher acts as a facilitator

The authority figure is lost and the teacher's role is to facilitate or assist the student's activities. change in classroom hierarchy .

I want information to enroll in the Psychoanalysis Course .

  1. Knowledge comes from the student
Also read: Best psychologists and psychologists in Londrina PR

If before the teacher's knowledge was held as the only truth, now knowledge comes from the student. Thus, in non-directive pedagogy, the student's baggage and experiences are highly valued Also, the student can be seen as the center of learning.

  1. Self-Sufficient Study

Since the teacher is only a facilitator, he/she does not teach as much. So, with this learning process, it is up to the student to seek more materials for his/her learning on his/her own.

Anti-pedagogy or non-directive pedagogy

As much as the non-directive pedagogy values the student's experiences, it also has problems, because the figure of the teacher is lost, that is, there is an anti-pedagogy, since it excludes the responsibilities that are proper of the teacher.

The teacher, as a trained professional, is the one who is able to judge the relevance and sources of the content to be learned. However, since the teacher does not teach, he/she cannot interfere in pedagogical practices.

Taking into consideration that everyone has his or her own background, the contents worked on will not always be the same. Therefore, it seems that the relevant subjects may not reach all the students.

About renewed non-directive pedagogy

Understand that there is a liberal trend behind non-directive pedagogy. This is because there are changes not only in education, but in all spheres of society. In this sense, besides the transformation of the relationship between educator and student, the school institution also undergoes changes.

Thus, it is up to the school to be responsible for psychological issues in the midst of such changes. Therefore, the space of formal education needs to be ready for the student to develop the appreciation of his "self" without considering the experience of exchange.

Therefore, pedagogical criteria no longer have the importance they had before. The same happens with issues related to social aspects. Thus, we can infer that this movement ends up creating more self-centered individuals, without concern for the collective .

Final considerations on directive pedagogy

In this article, we have outlined an overview of some pedagogical practices. We have contrasted two approaches, directive pedagogy and non-directive pedagogy. We hope that you, the reader, have understood the differences between the two.

Remember that formal education is part of the experience of all of us as a society, so it is important to know the implications behind the choices educators and school institutions make in their daily lives.

Finally, the way we experience educational processes are increasingly linked to our psychological and emotional processes. Thus, to better understand the impacts of directive pedagogy and how it influences us, do our 100% online psychoanalysis course With it, you will learn the main psychological currents, and your life will never be the same again.

I want information to enroll in the Psychoanalysis Course .

George Alvarez

George Alvarez is a renowned psychoanalyst who has been practicing for over 20 years and is highly regarded in the field. He is a sought-after speaker and has conducted numerous workshops and training programs on psychoanalysis for professionals in the mental health industry. George is also an accomplished writer and has authored several books on psychoanalysis that have received critical acclaim. George Alvarez is dedicated to sharing his knowledge and expertise with others and has created a popular blog on Online Training Course in Psychoanalysis that is widely followed by mental health professionals and students around the world. His blog provides a comprehensive training course that covers all aspects of psychoanalysis, from theory to practical applications. George is passionate about helping others and is committed to making a positive difference in the lives of his clients and students.